Jan Kumstat vs Gianmarco Ferrari Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jul at 12:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Kumstat vs G. Ferrari

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kumstat 1 - 0 Ferrari
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jan Kumstat winning 2 and Gianmarco Ferrari winning 0. The last match between Jan Kumstat and Gianmarco Ferrari was at the M15 Segrate, 24-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jan Kumstat getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kumstat | 1 |
| Ferrari | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Segrate(07-24-25)
J. Kumstat vs G. Ferrari H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,280 |
| 50.00% (25-25) | Career Total W/L | 54.34% (188-158) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Kumstat vs G. Ferrari Match Preview:
- How do Ferrari and Kumstat compare in terms of second serve success? Ferrari has a slightly higher success rate on second serve points, winning 42.92%, compared to Kumstat's 40.74%.
- What about their performance in return games? Kumstat leads on winning opponent's second serve returns at 48.63%, whereas Ferrari excels in first serve returns at 32.04%.
- Under pressure, Kumstat shows a better ability to save breakpoints with a 52.47% success rate, slightly outperforming Ferrari's 50.34%.
- Overall performance in the past year favors Ferrari, as they have won 55.1% of their matches, compared to Kumstat's 45%.
- When considering surface preference, Ferrari excels on Clay with a 56% win rate, while Kumstat's best surface is I.hard with a 60% success rate.
- In terms of competition level, Ferrari has a higher winning percentage in lower-tier tournaments at 59.09%, compared to Kumstat's 42.86%.
- Ferrari has competed against lower-ranked opponents on average (rank 472.45 vs. Kumstat's 343.6), which may affect comparative evaluations.
- Both players have an equally strong record in deciding sets, each winning 60% of them in the past year.
- Ferrari's breakpoint conversion rate is higher at 40.1%, indicating a stronger ability to capitalize on opportunities than Kumstat, who converts at 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Ferrari and Kumstat will highlight the distinct strengths each player brings to the court. Ferrari appears to have a slight edge in second serve performance, which can often be crucial in tight matches. Coupled with a stronger breakpoint conversion rate, Ferrari shows a strong potential to seize critical moments.
Kumstat, however, demonstrates strength in return games, particularly when handling second serves. This ability to put pressure on opponents during their service games makes Kumstat a formidable competitor.
Despite Kumstat's edge in return games and superior breakpoint defense, Ferrari's overall performance record, especially on favorable clay surfaces, coupled with a historical advantage in deciding sets, suggests that Ferrari is the more likely candidate for victory in this match. Considering the data and trends, Ferrari appears better positioned to secure the win.
Jan Kumstat vs Gianmarco Ferrari Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Kumstat vs G. Ferrari H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:24:7 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 60% (33/55) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35/56) |
| 91% (30/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (22/35) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (24/56) | Return Points Win % | 27% (15/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Kumstat Recent Matches Played
G. Ferrari Recent Matches Played

J. Kumstat vs G. Ferrari Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (25/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.34% (188/158) |
| 47.27% (52/58) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.16% (421/371) |
| 48.44% (512/545) | Games Win/Loss | 51.56% (3827/3596) |
| 45.45% (5/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.90% (165/125) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 188 | Aces Total | 941 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 112 | Total Double Faults | 987 |
| 1:24:53 | Average Match Time | 1:26:52 |
| 351.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.64 |
| 54% (1635/3007) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11837/19639) |
| 70% (1148/1635) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (7853/11837) |
| 46% (629/1372) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3924/7802) |
| 37% (118/315) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (876/1999) |
| 39% (1219/3094) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7970/19584) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Challenger W/L | 43.55% (27/35) |
| 58.33% (21/15) | Futures W/L | 57.35% (160/119) |
| 49% (23/47) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (183/339) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 71% (10/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (51/106) |
| 64% (7/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (56/105) |
| 95% (21/20) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (176/148) |
| 5% (21/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (176/28) |
| 14% (29/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (170/40) |